When was Riley v California argued?
2014Riley v. California / Date argued
Why is California v Greenwood important?
California v. Greenwood, 486 U.S. 35 (1988), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the Fourth Amendment does not prohibit the warrantless search and seizure of garbage left for collection outside the curtilage of a home.
Why would the Supreme Court reject a writ of certiorari?
A decision to deny certiorari does not necessarily imply that the higher court agrees with the lower court’s ruling; instead, it simply means that fewer than four justices determined that the circumstances of the decision of the lower court warrant a review by the Supreme Court.
What is the fruit of the poisonous tree rule?
A doctrine that extends the exclusionary rule to make evidence inadmissible in court if it was derived from evidence that was illegally obtained. As the metaphor suggests, if the evidential “tree” is tainted, so is its “fruit.” The doctrine was established in 1920 by the decision in Silverthorne Lumber Co.
What is the significance of Riley v California?
U.S. Const. amend. IV Riley v. California, 573 U.S. 373 (2014), is a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court unanimously held that the warrantless search and seizure of digital contents of a cell phone during an arrest is unconstitutional.
Could Riley have been one of the shooters?
Although eyewitnesses to the shooting claimed that Riley could have been one of the shooters, they declined to give a definitive positive identification of Riley as one of the shooters. However, this was not known by Officer Dunnigan at the time of Riley’s traffic stop.
What happened to David Leon Riley?
In the first case, David Leon Riley was pulled over on August 22, 2009, for expired registrations tags. During the stop, the San Diego Police Officer also found that Riley was driving with a suspended driver’s license.
What did the San Diego police do with Riley’s license?
During the stop, the San Diego Police Officer also found that Riley was driving with a suspended driver’s license. The San Diego Police Department’s policy at the time was to tow and impound a vehicle after stopping a driver with a suspended license in order to prevent the driver from driving again.